Q !CbboFOtcZs 07-26-18 Thu 12:44:26 d74be4 (1) No.2296993

Q !CbboFOtcZs 07/26/18 (Thu) 12:44:26 d74be4 (1) No.2296993

Q !CbboFOtcZs 07/26/18 (Thu) 12:44:26 d74be4 (1) No.2296993

https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf

What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

Known beforehand?

Optics.

Think logically.

Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?

Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?

Think logically.

One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

Who does Huber [directly] report to?

Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

Why is this important?

Why did Sessions recuse?

Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?

LOGICAL THINKING.

Clickbait derails logical thought.

Think for yourself.

Trust yourself.

Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

You have a front row seat.

Enjoy the show.

Q

ANON ANSWERS

Thanks, I am enjoying the show. These are the best seats in the HOUSE.

Mueller is investigation POTUS tweets (1st Amendment expression) for Obstruction of what exactly? Cover to investigate POTUS laser focus on REAL OBSTRUCTION!

I Trust myself. I Think for myself. I don’t click BAIT. I apply LOGIC when analyzig the information.

I do not think POTUS would allow anyone to run HIS DOJ no to his liking, JS runs the DOJ, [RR] oversees the SC, RM.

I know “It’s happening” I see the resignations, the suicides and the PANIC. I see the Nations bending to POTUS demands. I hear the lies form the left MSM/D’s/DS.

I see “the swamp is being drained” as the Cronys and the OLD guard step aside. I hear the silence from the ones stepping aside, LOUD AND CLEAR.

I do not believe POTUS woud allow a takeover of his DOJ, he is the head of the EXECUTIVE and has CONSTITUTIONAL right to make changes he sees fit to the BRANCH.

POTUS knows if he expresses anger for JS recusal, the DS and leftist will PROTECT JS OPTICALLY.

This setup allows JS to continue investigations in background into the TREASON and CORRUPTION perpatrated on our NATION and PEOPLE.

NO the left is not attacking JS.

Sessions Recused because SC investigating the Trump Campaign which he was part of from the beginning!

This is important because it insulates him from the fallout when the Investigation is exposed for what it really is, a distraction from real CRIMES against the PEOPLE

This is normal if the head of the DOJ is recused from ongoing investigation.

He still has to run the DOJ. Huber reports to Sessions.

Sessions can not know the facts being fully recused, unless he was involved in such Collusin or OBSTRUCTION

Yes if he knew those facts he would be implicated in the involvement?

If he challenges [RR] Sessions would be impeached by Congress.

No he cannot publicly challenge [RR] without causing a dilemna.

Since [RR] was widely supported in his confirmation hearings there will be little support to impeach, but this exposes the swamp creatures for what they are when [RR] and RM get exposed. Corrupt.

Scan to Donate Bitcoin
Like this? Donate Bitcoin to at:
Bitcoin 31vKy4rWe4XoEJk9XmAUV9Z7uqdA6UyXvq
Donate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *