QANON RR Rod Rosinstien Impeachment

>What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject? To make Rosenstein look like a deep state stooge >Known beforehand? OF COURSE. >Optics. Always matter. >Think logically. Look at the big picture >Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma? No >What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]? It would look like right vs left politics as usual in a DOJ that is supposed to be above the fray >Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts? Yes >Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused? Yes >Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from? Yes >Think logically. Sessions would appear to not be acting in good faith >One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from. That would be dishonest >Who does Huber [directly] report to? RR >Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC? No >Why is this important? Because RR is the one who was confirmed 94-6, not Sessions >Why did Sessions recuse? He's too unpopular with the left >Is the LEFT attacking Sessions? No, because he recused himself >What advantage(s) exist based on this setup? When POTUS is exonerated, it will be accepted by both sides because it will come from RR and RM >POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal? To reinforce the notion that RR and RM are his enemies >Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable? No >When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it? Of course! >When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it? Of course! >Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking? No way! >LOGICAL THINKING. Is rarely encouraged elsewhere >Clickbait derails logical thought. That's what the media does best >Think for yourself. It's still not illegal >Trust yourself. We're not wrong. >Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction? Suuuuuuuure he is. >You have a front row seat. In every sense of the expression >Enjoy the show. Yes sir! >Q

>What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

To make Rosenstein look like a deep state stooge

>Known beforehand?

OF COURSE.

>Optics.

Always matter.

>Think logically.

Look at the big picture

>Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

No

>What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?

It would look like right vs left politics as usual in a DOJ that is supposed to be above the fray

>Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

Yes

>Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

Yes

>Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?

Yes

>Think logically.

Sessions would appear to not be acting in good faith

>One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

That would be dishonest

>Who does Huber [directly] report to?

RR

>Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

No

>Why is this important?

Because RR is the one who was confirmed 94-6, not Sessions

>Why did Sessions recuse?

He’s too unpopular with the left

>Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

No, because he recused himself

>What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

When POTUS is exonerated, it will be accepted by both sides because it will come from RR and RM

>POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

To reinforce the notion that RR and RM are his enemies

>Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

No

>When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

Of course!

>When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

Of course!

>Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?

No way!

>LOGICAL THINKING.

Is rarely encouraged elsewhere

>Clickbait derails logical thought.

That’s what the media does best

>Think for yourself.

It’s still not illegal

>Trust yourself.

We’re not wrong.

>Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

Suuuuuuuure he is.

>You have a front row seat.

In every sense of the expression

>Enjoy the show.

Yes sir!

>Q

>What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

To make Rosenstein look like a deep state stooge

>Known beforehand?

OF COURSE.

>Optics.

Always matter.

>Think logically.

Look at the big picture

>Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

No

>What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?

It would look like right vs left politics as usual in a DOJ that is supposed to be above the fray

>Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

Yes

>Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

Yes

>Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?

Yes

>Think logically.

Sessions would appear to not be acting in good faith

>One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

That would be dishonest

>Who does Huber [directly] report to?

RR

>Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

No

>Why is this important?

Because RR is the one who was confirmed 94-6, not Sessions

>Why did Sessions recuse?

He’s too unpopular with the left

>Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

No, because he recused himself

>What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

When POTUS is exonerated, it will be accepted by both sides because it will come from RR and RM

>POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

To reinforce the notion that RR and RM are his enemies

>Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

No

>When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

Of course!

>When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

Of course!

>Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?

No way!

>LOGICAL THINKING.

Is rarely encouraged elsewhere

>Clickbait derails logical thought.

That’s what the media does best

>Think for yourself.

It’s still not illegal

>Trust yourself.

We’re not wrong.

>Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

Suuuuuuuure he is.

>You have a front row seat.

In every sense of the expression

>Enjoy the show.

Yes sir!

>Q

Scan to Donate Bitcoin
Like this? Donate Bitcoin to at:
Bitcoin 31vKy4rWe4XoEJk9XmAUV9Z7uqdA6UyXvq
Donate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *