Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

8chan top News story today!!!

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”
 nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks
nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks

 

Do you realize whats being said here?  A discussion about “non-leagal” strategies to take down Wikleaks and Julian Assange Specifically 

Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”

“Nonlegal strategies.” How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any “nonlegal strategies” for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldn’t all the strategies discussed by the country’s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious “nonlegal strategy” proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange? Numerous attempts were made to try and interview and decipher Slaughter’s choice of email wording, however, she could not be reached for comment. Insiders said Slaughter is keeping a “low profile” in Princeton, NJ until she is nominated for a position in Clinton’s cabinet if the Democrat is elected in November. Likewise, True Pundit attempted to contact Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan for their perspectives on this story. None commented on the record.

 

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

Anon on 8ch post this
Truepundit HRC Drone strike assange cheryl mills huma abedin jacob sullivan wikileaks
Truepundit HRC Drone strike assange cheryl mills huma abedin jacob sullivan wikileaks

>>3462019

>>3462037

 

Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”

“Nonlegal strategies.” How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any “nonlegal strategies” for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldn’t all the strategies discussed by the country’s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious “nonlegal strategy” proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange? Numerous attempts were made to try and interview and decipher Slaughter’s choice of email wording, however, she could not be reached for comment. Insiders said Slaughter is keeping a “low profile” in Princeton, NJ until she is nominated for a position in Clinton’s cabinet if the Democrat is elected in November. Likewise, True Pundit attempted to contact Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan for their perspectives on this story. None commented on the record.

Slaughter’s cryptic email also contained an attached document called “SP Wikileaks doc final11.23.10.docx.” That attachment portion of Slaughter’s “nonlegal strategies” email has yet to be recovered by federal investigators and House committee investigators probing Clinton’s email practices while at State. Even Wikileaks does not have the document. Slaughter, however, shed some light on the attachment: “The result is the attached memo, which has one interesting legal approach and I think some very good suggestions about how to handle our public diplomacy.”

But did it also include details on the “nonlegal strategies” teased in the subject line?

 

Scan to Donate Bitcoin
Like this? Donate Bitcoin to at:
Bitcoin 31vKy4rWe4XoEJk9XmAUV9Z7uqdA6UyXvq
Donate

QAnon QResearch The Great Awakening Artwork Share this on your favorite Social Network

Use this artwork for spreading the Good News of the The Great Awakening and to prepare for justice to be served to the Traitors. The Artwork can be correlated with the included QAnon Post on 8chan.

Apr 24 2018 11:27:03 Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 1169101 Iran is next.
Apr 24 2018 11:27:03
Q
!xowAT4Z3VQ
1169101
Iran is next.
[Marker].
Re_read.
POTUS today.
“Mark it down.”
“Bigger problems than ever before.”
SIG to Iran?
CLAS – Sec 11A P 2.2 [important]
Refers to more than continued payments of $250B.
IRON EAGLE.
Sweet Dreams.
Q
Reminder.
Iran is next.
Marker.
CLAS – Sec 11A P 2.2.
“Installments.”
$250B.
Jan 1.
Jun 1.
No inspection @ GZ NR sites.
No missile tech prevention.
Load carrying.
ICBM.
Think NK.
Who controls the $?
Who really controls the $?
Why does the EU have a vested interest in this deal?
Who receives the money?
When the US sends billions in aid and/or climate and/or etc who or what entity audits / tracks to confirm intended recipient(s) rec?
None.
How does GS fund WW counter-events?
Who funds WW leftist events?
American taxpayer (subsidize).
Define nuclear stand-off.
Who benefits?
How do you ‘squeeze’ funds out of the US?
Threat to humanity?
Environment push?
Think Paris accord.
Who audits / tracks the funneled money?
Define kickback.
Define slush fund.
EPA.
No oversight re: Hussein.
Why?
How does the C_A fund non sanctioned ops?
Off the books?
Re_ read past drops.
Will become relevant.
Welcome Mr. President.
The U.S. will NOT agree to continue the Iran deal as it currently stands.
Q

What if U1 material ended up in Syria? SUM OF ALL FEARS.
What if U1 material ended up in Syria? SUM OF ALL FEARS.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/30/17 (Thu) 00:38:37 7ebe7c No.13092 Focus on Hussein. Revelations coming very very soon. HUMA - SA - Hussein.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/30/17 (Thu) 00:38:37 7ebe7c No.13092
Focus on Hussein.
Revelations coming very very soon.
HUMA – SA – Hussein.

 

POTUS deCLAS Syria/Iran + U1 connection.
POTUS deCLAS Syria/Iran + U1 connection.
Scan to Donate Bitcoin
Like this? Donate Bitcoin to at:
Bitcoin 31vKy4rWe4XoEJk9XmAUV9Z7uqdA6UyXvq
Donate

QAnon QResearch GreatAwakening Artwork

Use this artwork for spreading the Good News of the The Great Awakening and to prepare for justice to be served to the Traitors. The Artwork can be correlated with the included QAnon Post on 8chan.

Apr 24 2018 11:27:03 Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 1169101 Iran is next.
Apr 24 2018 11:27:03
Q
!xowAT4Z3VQ
1169101
Iran is next.
[Marker].
Re_read.
POTUS today.
“Mark it down.”
“Bigger problems than ever before.”
SIG to Iran?
CLAS – Sec 11A P 2.2 [important]
Refers to more than continued payments of $250B.
IRON EAGLE.
Sweet Dreams.
Q
Reminder.
Iran is next.
Marker.
CLAS – Sec 11A P 2.2.
“Installments.”
$250B.
Jan 1.
Jun 1.
No inspection @ GZ NR sites.
No missile tech prevention.
Load carrying.
ICBM.
Think NK.
Who controls the $?
Who really controls the $?
Why does the EU have a vested interest in this deal?
Who receives the money?
When the US sends billions in aid and/or climate and/or etc who or what entity audits / tracks to confirm intended recipient(s) rec?
None.
How does GS fund WW counter-events?
Who funds WW leftist events?
American taxpayer (subsidize).
Define nuclear stand-off.
Who benefits?
How do you ‘squeeze’ funds out of the US?
Threat to humanity?
Environment push?
Think Paris accord.
Who audits / tracks the funneled money?
Define kickback.
Define slush fund.
EPA.
No oversight re: Hussein.
Why?
How does the C_A fund non sanctioned ops?
Off the books?
Re_ read past drops.
Will become relevant.
Welcome Mr. President.
The U.S. will NOT agree to continue the Iran deal as it currently stands.
Q

What if U1 material ended up in Syria? SUM OF ALL FEARS.
What if U1 material ended up in Syria? SUM OF ALL FEARS.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/30/17 (Thu) 00:38:37 7ebe7c No.13092 Focus on Hussein. Revelations coming very very soon. HUMA - SA - Hussein.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/30/17 (Thu) 00:38:37 7ebe7c No.13092
Focus on Hussein.
Revelations coming very very soon.
HUMA – SA – Hussein.

 

POTUS deCLAS Syria/Iran + U1 connection.
POTUS deCLAS Syria/Iran + U1 connection.
Scan to Donate Bitcoin
Like this? Donate Bitcoin to at:
Bitcoin 31vKy4rWe4XoEJk9XmAUV9Z7uqdA6UyXvq
Donate